Havish M Consulting
Customer Case Study · Government & Public Sector Advisory
Professional Services × Havish M Consulting

Every signature snipped, named and filed in one click

For a central government ministry study, the advisory firm had thousands of respondent signatures on creased, noisy A4 scans. HMC built an Excel VBA tool that captures each one, saves it under the right respondent's name and lets the team undo a bad capture, cutting turnaround from 200 hours to 8.

ClientProfessional Services FunctionGovernment & Public Sector Advisory ThemeField Data Digitisation
Turnaround for the signature set
0hours
▼ from 200 hours
Reduction in TAT
0%
▼ 200 hours down to 8
Time per signature
0seconds
▼ from about 2 minutes
Files saved under the wrong name
0files
▼ auto-named from the respondent list

Figures indicative; validated metrics available on request.

The Challenge

Thousands of signatures, trapped on paper

The project for the central government ministry needed every respondent's contact validated. The evidence was a signature, captured in the field on A4 sheets, one row per respondent.

Signatures on A4

Respondents signed printed sheets in the field. Each sheet held dozens of rows from different employers and states.

Noisy, creased scans

Image quality varied. Folds and creases cut across rows, and scans were uneven in light and angle.

One image per respondent

Validation needed each signature as its own file, named exactly after the respondent, so it could be matched to their contact.

200 hours of snipping

Crop, paste, rename, save, check, repeat. Done by hand, the full set would take about 200 hours, with misnamed files along the way.

HMC Approach

Keep the human eye, automate everything around it

Automatic signature detection was unreliable on creased scans, so a person still frames each signature. The macro does the rest: naming, saving, highlighting and moving on.

Select a step to see what happened.

Discover · Time the manual way

We timed analysts cropping signatures by hand.

  • About 2 minutes per signature: crop, paste, rename, save and check.
  • Most errors were naming errors: the right image under the wrong respondent.
  • Creases and noise defeated automatic detection on many sheets.

Deliverable: Time-and-error baseline.

Design · Person frames, macro files

Split the task: judgement for a person, routine for the macro.

  • The scanned sheet sits next to the respondent list in Excel.
  • Names come from the list, in order, never typed.
  • Guard checks before every save: path exists, path valid, exactly one capture.

Deliverable: Flow chart and UserForm layout.

Build · SAVE SIGNATURES form

A small UserForm with two buttons and a path box.

  • SAVE: picks the name from the cell, pastes the capture, exports it as an image named after the respondent, highlights the row and moves to the next name.
  • RESET: deletes the last capture and steps the name index back.
  • Clear message boxes for a missing path, a wrong path or no capture.

Deliverable: Macro-enabled workbook and form.

Adopt · Ten-minute training

Analysts were productive the same day.

  • Set the destination folder once per batch.
  • Snip, SAVE, snip, SAVE; RESET only when a capture is wrong.
  • Highlighted rows show progress at a glance.

Deliverable: One-page guide.

Scale · Every state, same tool

Batches were split by state, such as AP & Telangana, and run in parallel.

  • One folder per state and employer.
  • File names matched the respondent list exactly for validation.
  • 200 hours of work finished in about 8.

Deliverable: Named signature library for validation.

The Solution

Snip, SAVE, next

First the original screens, then a working replica of the tool on a synthetic sheet. Try it: capture a signature, save it, make a mistake and RESET.

01 · The original screens

Field sheet, macro flow and the SAVE SIGNATURES form

Click any screen to enlarge it. Respondent names, phone numbers, addresses and signatures are pixelated.

Scanned field sheet listing respondents with employer, dates and signatures, personal details pixelated
A field sheet, AP & Telangana. Respondents in the garment segment with start and end dates, employer (for example Vedavathi Fashions, Vanitha Garment Centre, Ramya Botique) and a signature column. The scan shows the noise and uneven lines the tool had to cope with.
Flow chart of the SAVE and RESET macro logic with checks and message boxes
The macro flow. SAVE checks the path exists and is correct and that exactly one screenshot is present, then picks the name, adds the picture, saves the image, highlights the name and moves the index on. RESET deletes the picture and steps back.
SAVE SIGNATURES UserForm with SAVE and RESET buttons and a destination path box
The UserForm. SAVE to file the capture, RESET if the screenshot was wrong, and a destination path.
02 · Signature station

Try the tool

Click a signature on the scan to capture it (the dashed box is your screenshot). Press SAVE to file it under the highlighted respondent's name. Capture the wrong row, or clear the path, to see the checks and RESET at work.

Scanned field sheet · syntheticClick a signature to capture it
Screenshot
Click a signature, or drag a box like a real screenshot. Keys: Enter snip next row · S SAVE · R RESET
SAVE SIGNATURES
Click to save in directory Use in case the screenshot taken was incorrect
INSERT DESTINATION PATH HERE
Microsoft Excel
!
Next name: —
1 · Snip
2 · Greyscale
3 · Ink only
4 · Despeckle
5 · Trim & save
Capture quality—
📁 D:\Project\Signatures\AP-Telangana0 files

Synthetic sheet: respondent names, employers and signatures are generated. The clean-up stages illustrate ink isolation, despeckling and trimming.

03 · Validation desk

From named file to verified respondent

Every file you saved above lands here, matched to the respondent's contact record. Run validation to see how a clean, correctly named library flows straight into contact checks, and how wrong or partial captures get caught.

Contacts are synthetic and masked. Validation outcomes are simulated.
04 · Batch board

6,000 signatures across six states

Four analysts, one tool each. Press Run to watch every state's batch fill, with the tool's clock running against what the same work would have cost by hand.

Signatures filed
0
Analyst hours with the tool
0.0 h
Same work by hand
0 h

Tool: about 5 seconds per signature. By hand: about 2 minutes. State split is illustrative.

Impact Dashboard

200 hours became 8

The person still frames each signature, but everything else (naming, saving, tracking and correcting) now takes seconds.

Hours to extract the full set

Each square is one hour of analyst time

Manual hourHour with the toolHour saved

Where two minutes per signature went

Seconds per signature, by step

Figures indicative; validated metrics available on request.

Before vs After

How signatures reach validation now

DimensionBeforeAfter
CapturingCrop in an image tool, paste, adjustSnip the signature beside the list
NamingType each respondent's name by handName taken from the respondent list
SavingSave As, browse to folder, every timeAuto-saved to the assigned folder
MistakesFound later during validationRESET undoes the last capture at once
ProgressTracked on paperEach saved name highlighted in the sheet
TurnaroundAbout 200 hoursAbout 8 hours
Tools & Tech Used

Small tool, big batch

Excel VBA SAVE and RESET macros VBA UserForm SAVE SIGNATURES Screen capture one signature per snip Chart export capture saved as an image file Respondent list single source for file names
Key Takeaways

What any research team can borrow

01

Automate around the judgement

When scans are too messy for full automation, keep the person on the hard bit and automate every step around it.

02

Never type a name twice

Taking names from the respondent list removed the most common error: the right image under the wrong name.

03

Make undo one click

RESET made mistakes cheap to fix in the moment, instead of costly to find during validation.